Paper title: |
Comparison of non-linear optlmlsatlon with genetic algorithmsin the case of i-beam optimal design according to eurocode 3 |
Authors: |
Krajnc A, Beg D |
Summary: |
This paper compares three different methods for non-linear optimisation of steel I-beams designaccording to European pre-standard Eurocode 3. The first two methods are based on non-linearprogramming, which is briefly introduced. The third method - Genetic algorithms - is based onheuristics and is widely used in many practical optimisation problems. All three methods were used ontwo examples. The results show that all three methods give similar solutions. Non-linear programmingmethods outperform genetic algorithms when computational time is taken into account, but geneticalgorithms require much less coding and are able to locate global optimum better than non-linearprogramming methods. |
Type: |
|
Year of publication: |
1997 |
Series: |
ecce:1997 |
Download paper: |
/pdfs/ecce-1997-223.content.pdf |
Citation: |
Krajnc A, Beg D (1997).
Comparison of non-linear optlmlsatlon with genetic algorithmsin the case of i-beam optimal design according to eurocode 3. Sarja A (editor); Computers in the practice of building and civil engineering, Worldwide ECCE symposium; September 3-5, 1997, Finland,
http://itc.scix.net/paper/ecce-1997-223
|